\section{Interview Guide for Søren Møller Jensen}
\label{appsec:sorenmollerjensenGuide}

\begin{itemize}

\item Can you please introduce yourself?
\item What is your role in Copenhagen Capacity?
\item What do you think are the most important organizational barriers for establishing an innovation platform based on public and private data? What are the most important factors for overcoming these barriers? (Because you write in your report that it is a technical challenge AND an organizational challenge).
\item You distinguish between direct and indirect value creation when writing about the realization of the big market potential. What do you think is the biggest hindrance for unleashing the potential of indirect revenues? Especially the indirect revenue that ‘open data’ can contribute to.
\item What is the biggest challenge for Copenhagen Connecting to be successful? They have a big emphasis on creating an innovation platform (with much of the indirect revenue that you write about). How to overcome these challenges?
\item Is CCC’s ‘Big Data Infrastructure’ facing the same challenges?
\item These projects, which establish infrastructures for further smart-city initiatives (with potential for many derived values) seem to include a lot of stakeholders from the triple-helix, who have to have a mutual understanding of how to utilize the infrastructure. Does it make sense to talk about smart-city maturity among stakeholders?
\item Do you know about IDC Government Insight’s smart-city maturity model? Would it be beneficial for a smart-city to have a reference maturity model for assessing stakeholder’s maturity levels and thereby be able to make smart-city initiatives, which every stakeholder can understand?
\item Influence of the PSI-directive. Is it limiting the possibilities of reusing data for innovation platforms? Denmark has not made any changes to that.

\end{itemize}

